Having an animal in the toe could mean that you are not allowed in an area that serves or sells food, but that’s for a good reason. Public health and safety standards seem to demand that the food we eat should be separated from our furry friends based on some fairly obvious factors:
- Animals do not really care where and when they use the toilet, especially when untrained
- Animals will indiscriminately enter their own feces or urine
- Animals can carry parasites, bedbugs, and all kinds of creepy crawly nonsense.
- Many animals stink, and it’s not funny to eat chicken parmesan next to them.
You think a lot of this is common sense, but idiots will be jerks. This increases the need for people to seek emotional support from animals and to renew the never-ending cycle of stupid behavior and unnecessary problems.
Actually, ESA animals only have access rights for transport and housing. ESA has no public access rights, only SERVICE DOGS have public access and service Miniature horses have access rights. No other zodiac has public access rights. The problem is, all FACTER with the law and know that companies are afraid to question someone with the vest or ID for fear of litigation. However, they would WIN the suit if it is only an ESA animal as the ADA law specifies the difference between an ESA and a service animal. Being hindered by yourself, it is very frustrating to see all of these counterfeiters use them. It is easy to find a REAL service dog, for example, they are well behaved and are not fed by tables in restaurants. Most minions become “invisible”.